this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
61 points (81.4% liked)

Programming

17483 readers
191 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey all, thought this might be of interest to some here.

Wrote about why I moved from NixOS to Ubuntu after using it for several months on my daily driver. Suspect that this take is likely to be kind of controversial and court claims of skill issues, which might even be true.

Let me know what you think.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oessessnex 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nope, nix doesn't ensure or require that the builds are deterministic. It's not any better in that regard than other package managers.

[–] Shareni 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

nix doesn't ensure or require that the builds are deterministic

Pin package version and --pure?

That should already allow it to be ahead of other PMs.

[–] oessessnex 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

A package is reproducible if you use the same inputs, run the build, and get the same outputs.

The issue is that the build can produce different outputs given the same inputs. So you need to modify the build or patch the outputs. This is something that is being worked on by most distributions: https://reproducible-builds.org/who/projects/

NixOS is not special in that regard nor are all NixOS packages reproducible.