this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
341 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
12 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hundreds have joined a UK class action lawsuit against LGBTQ+ dating app Grindr, seeking damages over a historical case of the company allegedly forwarding users' HIV status as well as other sensitive data to third-party advertisers.

This data included a user's HIV status and their last test date, their sexual preferences, and their GPS location – all of which were added to public profiles by users and later gathered up by Grindr's trackers.

The Norwegian Data Protection Authority (NO DPA) fined Grindr 65 million Norwegian kroner in 2020 ($5.9 million at today's exchange rate) for violating GDPR's consent rules. NO DPA's case didn't mention any violations regarding the sharing of HIV data or information about a user's sexual preferences. However, it ruled that third parties had received a user's GPS location, IP address, advertising ID, age, gender, and the fact that they used the app, and concluded that Grindr had disclosed user data to third parties "for behavioural advertisement without a legal basis."

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said in October last year it was pushing for the FTC to probe the app maker after finding that it was retaining user data even after accounts were deleted – a practice Grindr's privacy policy explicitly says it wouldn't do.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 106 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Always assume all companies will sell your data regardless of what they say and or claim...why is this hard for people to understand? None of these companies have your interests in mind, they don't care. It's all profit.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Love when apps need a govt id to verify id.

Looking at you, Facebook.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, not touching that with a 10ft poll.

The only groups that need my govt details are those who interact with the government, and I don't want my social media apps to do any of that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I discovered what works with Youtube (for age verification) is sending a picture of an ID with everything redacted but the date of birth, so that the date was the one and only thing visible. That worked! Although it could've really been anyone's ID, lol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I'd just send my middle finger with an old-enough birthdate (not mine) written on it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wait YouTube requires id verification to view "mature" content?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Not normally but if your account gets reported for being a minor or something they might. Possibly also for receiving money from ad income if you post content as well?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I told Facebook I wouldn't even consider taking the picture of my ID, let alone sending it, let alone to them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I just deleted my account and installed "Facebook Container" in Firefox. Seems to have solved my problem pretty well.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What does Facebook need id for exactly?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

When did that happen?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

That doesn’t mean we should accept it.

[–] mark 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I get the sense that most people on this platform get it. It's the people that would never even be on Lemmy to see this advice that I worry about. Those are the ones that need to keep seeing these posts and comments like yours.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Exactly. It's absurd that we allow companies to get away with shit like this.