Fediverse

27910 readers

1 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

147

Could We Build a Decentralised Social Platform Rooted in Place? (carlnewton.github.io)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Over the past year or so I’ve been playing with the idea of a decentralised social platform based on your location. By putting physical location at the centre of the experience, such a platform could be used to bring communities together and provide a source of local information when travelling. Please let me know what you guys think.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

asdfasfasf

[–] mark 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

VPN adoption is skyrocketing

I always tell people this. But they think I'm lying. Is there anything online that confirms this that I can point them to?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think automatic device location data can certainly help to create a smooth experience, but I wouldn't rely on it to choose the location of a post in any instance. The user should always have the option of dropping a marker on a map or specifying a post code etc. This won't only help with situations involving a VPN, but also when posting about a specific location, such as a local library when you're at home.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

asdfasfasf

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm a bit too much of an optimist, but I'd hope that distributed administration would help with that sort of thing. But I don't know, do Mastodon users seem to be more racist than Twitter users? Perhaps an important difference would be that it might be a bit more difficult to block an intolerant user if you knew he'd come knocking on your door!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It boils down to moderators dropping the internalized mandate of “protecting free speech” as well as not being so literal with rules/enforcement that they can be used against the community.

If someone is consistently disrupting the community, ban them. If they’re using obvious dog whistles and arguing they didn’t technically break the rules, ban them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

With any luck, federated platforms will have an increasingly prevalent role on the internet, and affective moderation will become more of a science as more of us are provided situations in which we need to moderate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think part of the issue is the churn burn of mods. New mods all assume everything can be “peacefully resolved” and get taken advantage of OR they truly don’t give a shit and give safe haven to the disrupters by telling squeaky wheels in the community “they don’t break the rules so it’s impossible to ban them.”

Older mods drop the ban hammer typically more and get harassed until they’re tired of it and move on.