this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024

59 points (91.5% liked)

Rust

6035 readers

3 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

[email protected]

Credits

The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

"Clean" Code, Horrible Performance in Rust (chrs.dev)

submitted 7 months ago by chrs to c/rust

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (12 children)

It would be interesting to see if an iterator instead of a manual for loop would increase the performance of the base case.

My guess is not, because the compiler should know they are equivalent, but would be interesting to check anyway.

[–] onlinepersona 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (9 children)

Do you mean this for loop?

for shape in &shapes {
  accum += shape.area();
}

That does use an iterator

for-in-loops, or to be more precise, iterator loops, are a simple syntactic sugar over a common practice within Rust, which is to loop over anything that implements IntoIterator until the iterator returned by .into_iter() returns None (or the loop body uses break).

Anti Commercial AI thingy

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] arendjr 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think they meant using for accumulating, like this:

shapes.iter().map(Shape::area).sum()

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Yes. That's what I meant.

Though I heavily expect the rust compiler to produce identical assembly for both types of iteration.

[–] onlinepersona 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I see. That would be interesting to benchmark too 👍

Anti Commercial AI thingy

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Anti Commercial AI thingy

Off-topic, but does that actually work? I would assume OpenAI would just ignore it and you'd have to prove that they did so.

[–] onlinepersona 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Dunno if it works. AI has been tricked into revealing it's training data, so it's possible that it happens and they are sued for using copyrighted material.

This is my drop in the ocean.

Anti Commercial AI thingy

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'll join you. :)

[–] onlinepersona 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Welcome 🙂 A drop more.

Btw, if you're using linux and X11, you can bind a keyboard shortcut to the following shell-script (probably will need to install xte).

#!/usr/bin/env bash
sleep 0.5
xte "str Anti Commercial AI thingy"xte "key Return"
xte "str [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)"
xte "key Return"
xte "str "

Anti Commercial AI thingy

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm on Wayland, but I'm sure I can figure something out.

I do most of my lemmy-ing on mobile, so I'll probably make a bot to auto-edit my posts or something.

[–] onlinepersona 3 points 7 months ago

Have fun! I'm curious how you'll do it. If you figure out a way on Wayland, it would be great to read about it!

Anti Commercial AI thingy

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (8 replies)