this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
938 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
11 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 70 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I could see an argument about medical devices, HVAC, and vehicles... But I don't think I'd agree with them. Except maybe medical.

Consoles and toothbrushes though? What the fuck?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I guess console because they want the whole thing intact to enforce DRM?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (34 children)

I don't see any argument for vehicles, tbh. HVAC tinkering is almost exclusively high voltage so that makes just a little sense, don't want people swapping a 350 volt AC capacitor with a 250 volt DC capacitor and having it blow up, but Vehicles means a manufacturer can do everything imaginable to limit part availability and kill aftermarket parts purely for profits.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I do for things like ECUs that are programmed to the vin to prevent theft or tampering that would allow an attack vector for the vehicle.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Good thing part pairing doesn't exist for the Switch.

Mine is the Ship of Theseus at that point.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

For toothbrushes, are they worried repair won't re-seal it effectively so make it unsuitable for use in the wet environment?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I hope you're right and this isn't about them getting ready to DRM brush handles to brush heads. Sonicare brush heads are ridiculously overpriced compared to the knock offs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Which is dumb, because there's nothing stopping anyone from replacing the seals/glue when they put it back together. And at least in the USA manufactures have been covered for damages/harm resulting from a flawed consumer-based repair since since 1975.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I mean, I don't want the thing supplying the air I'm breathing to accidentally not burn all the gas and lead to carbon monoxide poisoning etc.... Things like the ductwork and shit, for sure, but not like, a burner.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The great irony is it's frequently the "ductwork" that's the problem: plugged or badly installed exhaust pipes, which the manufacture has no control over. The rest are the appliance itself wearing out or failing with no warning.

I've repaired furnaces myself several times including replacing burners and exhaust fans -- it isn't rocket science. It's no different than working on any other "dangerous" thing like a car. If someone somehow manages to fuck up so badly it hurts or kills someone that's on them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah that's totally valid. Agreed.

But I also wouldn't really trust third party parts for the appliance itself. I think once you do, that immediately becomes a possible problem. If it was in my house, I'd only buy from the manufacturer for something like that.

But on the other hand, Idk that it's necessarily wrong to legislate forcing these companies to allow it. I generally believe consumers should have the option on their own, but some things are too dangerous. I'd pretty much be against medical devices but HVAC is a little more uncertain to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So you want to be stuck with the same thermostat forever? Imagine it comes with one of those Amazon ones with a persistent camera and microphone in it that you can't opt out of.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A thermostat doesn't have refrigerants/gasses in them. It's nothing more than a complicated on off switch

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yet, a WiFi thermostat that stops getting updates is an extreme risk to that system if an attacker can access it. They could easily create a situation that causes a fire or a gas leak.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What... The.. Fuck?

If your thermostat could cause a fire or gas leak, your HVAC system is flawed. This is entirely a fabricated concern. If anything, I'd chalk it up as reasons why maybe right to repair the HVAC isn't a great idea. A properly setup HVAC wont let anything tell it to do that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

You can overheat the furnace and then short cycle it repeatedly, same with the a/c. You could shut off the furnace and cause the pipes to burst. Run the a/c in the winter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Firstly, I said this one was iffy to me.

Second, the subtopic was HVAC and thermostats are like, the electronics that control the HVAC which I wouldn't even really necessarily bucket into HVAC. It's like HVAC adjacent.

Third, this whole topic is about right to repair, not right to replace. So the on topic argument is "you want to be able to repair the same thermostat with off brand parts", to which I say, yes? Probably? I don't see how that's a problem.

And fourth, who the fuck would buy an Amazon thermostat, lmao.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's about parts pairing. HVAC companies could pair the thermostat to the system and you wouldn't be able to replace it with one of your choosing. People are buying smart TVs with Amazon and Google crap in them that came be removed or even bypassed in certain cases. Google owns nest, the most popular smart thermostat brand. Amazon has their own smart thermostat. People wouldn't think twice about having that included with their new HVAC system. It would be a selling point, just like smart TVs and all the other crap out there that will stop getting updates in 5 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's more "device" pairing than "parts" pairing. The thermostat to HVAC communication is a standard. Sure, if someone started forcing that, that'd be bad. But that's more akin to Apple's "iOS only works with MacBooks" type shit with Airdrop and such than it is to their "you can't replace the camera in your phone unless it's from us". They're both problems, but the one you're describing is both not happening and a different issue. I'm not saying it won't happen but it's a different topic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I believe most mini split systems have built in thermostat/remote control.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

You need some sort of licensing to do most HVAC work anyways. Theres no point in forcing companies to make all the parts available to the average joe when the average joe can't legally do the work anyways.