this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
88 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
11 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
88
Scams upon scams: The data-driven advertising grift (anotherangrywoman.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"Digital advertising is a scam from top to bottom. In fact, it’s several scams stacked on top of each other, wearing a trenchcoat, and some of the foundations of fibs are so effective that otherwise reasonable people entirely buy into them."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I certainly hope this person is really in marketing. I would agree that a lot of digital “metrics” are a scam. It’s all in the presentation of said metrics.

However, this article is comprised of poorly-sourced anecdotes and full of buzzwords and conjecture. The grammar also makes me question the validity of the storyteller.

I can’t gate-keep “marketing” but buyer beware on this one.

Edit: hey to all the downvoters - I’d love to know why, specifically, I am wrong?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

However, this article is comprised of poorly-sourced anecdotes and full of buzzwords and conjecture. The grammar also makes me question the validity of the storyteller.

Those sound like pretty convincing marketing bona-fides to me!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not sure if this comment is sardonic or sarcastic or genuine in tone so I can’t respond.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Genuinely sardonic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Toward my comment or the article?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Grue was making a joke about marketing people never saying anything meaningful and just slamming you with buzzwords and shit lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, lol, yeah. I have been in marketing communications for almost 20 years across tech, finance, and other industries and there is a lot of jargon that’s worthless. I do agree with the author that much of marketing can be shooting in the dark and knowing when to actually do something worthwhile with ad dollars can be hard. Digital marketing requires specialty knowledge most marketers dont have.