Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
I swear I rolled my eyes when my buddy said "they dont make shows like Columbo anymore" until I watched it.
Damn. They really dont.
I also cant imagine a columbo successor without Peter falk around, sad.
Yeah the inversion of a whodunit sounds like it would be boring because you know at the start who the murderer is.
But in a regular whodunit they can't really focus on the murderer since they'll give away the game. And you can usually just figure it out anyway because there's usually a character that has no reason to be there... unless they're the murder. Then the reveal at the end it's like, yup that character is the murderer.
The Columbo inversion of this allows for the focus to be on the murderer which is far more interesting. And usually the murderer is a smug rich asshole so watching him pester the shit out of him until he makes a mistake is very satisfying.
It also avoided the trap of getting into the personal life of Columbo. It's just about catching the criminal, not soap opera bullshit. Sure he mentions he has a wife (and a cousin, and an uncle, etc) but you can't really be sure if that's all just made up by Columbo to hustle the murderer into giving something up.
Fun bit of trivia: What was Columbo's first name? They never said. With HD TV you can make out a name on his ID, but they never said his first name throughout the show's run. It was all about catching the murderer.
Detective I think.
Funny you say that, when Peter Falk was asked, his answer was "Lieutenant."
The closest you'll get is Poker Face. It is a GIANT love letter to Columbo.
I really hope they do a second season.
Folks made a big fuss when it came out, so I'm hopeful. I loved it.