I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.
It's about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it's worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I'm probably biased because I wrote it :)
That's not the "actual definition" and is not even how the standard order of operations would interpret the expression.
Yes it is and yes it is 1917 (ii) - Lennes' letter (Terms and operators)
Only thing worth reading from you is the hashtag "#LoudlyNotUnderstandingThings"
So, you didn't understand it? Which part do you want me to explain further?
You are unhinged