this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
5 points (69.2% liked)
Programming
17668 readers
182 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ha. Although, as I understand it, this is a little off
Entangled particles do change. If you observe one (e.g. interact with it by a detection device, etc) that property collapses but so does the one on the opposite.
So this would make faster than light communication possible right? Except it wouldn’t because you can’t know if/when the particle you “read” was already collapsed or if you did it and thus “flipped” it’s entangled pair.
So we know that they change instantaneously over a distance and can confirm it. But we have to coordinate with the other endpoint to confirm it.
This means that we can only confirm which flipped which after the fact using methods that are themselves don’t break causality.
Here’s some fantastic PBS space time video on the subject
https://youtu.be/tafGL02EUOA
https://youtube.com/watch?v=msVuCEs8Ydo