this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
144 points (99.3% liked)
Ukraine
8208 readers
615 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Another ship successfully converted to a submarine. Great success for Glorious Mother Russia!
I always find it hilarious that Ukraine has sunk so many ships/submarines given they have no ships of their own.
In a way, they do. Their "drone" vehicles are still ships, of a sort. They're redefining the navy.
They're redefining the entire meaning of low cost assymmetrical warfare. Shit'll never be the same in a world where a 500€ toy can take out a 2m+ tank.
In the hands of national militaries, I'd say this makes war overall less palatable. I hope.
Otoh, it also means confederate yokels could in theory become real thorns in the side of pretty much anyone who disagrees with them (read: everyone else).
I am surprised but happy that the Russians have been unable to figure out a counter-measite to these.
I am sure every defense contractor out there is proposing solutions to the threat these cause now. The bidding process to update western navies defences has got to be fierce.
Phalanx CIWS seems like the correct tool for the job. Russia has a similar thing, ~~Kashtan~~ AK-630 CIWS. This boat was fitted with one, but it doesn't seem to be operating. Based on the disrepair of the flagship Moskva and it's CIWS which was not operational, I wouldn't be surprised if this boat's CIWS was also non-functional.
Their Naval forces seem to be much better than the Russians just the same