this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
145 points (84.4% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
17 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 149 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I don't care who makes it I'm not putting absolutely proprietary software in my brain

[–] [email protected] 78 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What's the worst that could happen?

Oh

[–] [email protected] 49 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't understand owning a computer that you don't fully control but using prosthetics that can be remotely disabled? This is why we need true open source GPL brain implants.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This isn’t a prosthetic that was remotely disabled, this is failing hardware that doesn’t have support from the original company which is in the process of going bankrupt.

I get where you’re coming from, and agree. Prosthesis and health devices should absolutely not be remotely controllable by a company. But you can’t really help a company shutting down.

And I highly doubt there are any open source implants which help sure blindness that are ready for prime time.

[–] learningduck 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But still, if the technology is open, then someone may design some compatible replacement hardware. Imagine some makers community rig a replacement for the blind without carrying about profitability.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That’s one aspect, absolutely.

The other side of that coin though, is if you really want random people tinkering with things directly attached to your body, without having a proper way to test beforehand?

These types of devices need to go through testing before they reach human trials for a reason. While I’m happy to trust security of data and even control of my while home to FOSS communities, I honestly don’t know that I’d trust anonymous individuals online with no skin in the game with my literal body.

[–] learningduck 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, that's a legitimate concern, but letting this technology die along with a dying company is a waste. Imagine it getting brought by some patent trolls who wouldn't do anything with it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm daily driving Linux. And, frankly, for my eye implant, I'll probably buy from apple.

I mean, no, I will buy something else, jailbreak foss it, will have to patch it while being blind from an update, and proudly tell everyone no friggin government will be able to backdoor my eye. But oh boy I'll wish I bought one from apple, cuz those guys never go blind from updates.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Or when you do go blind the ceo will just say you are holding your iEye in the wrong spot.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Aye aye captain

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

Yeah, like this is technology I've wanted since I was a kid, the stuff I wish people were talking about when they say VR, instead of screens you wear on your head and motion-detection controllers. Video games are a lot better when they are dynamic and current VR tech can't really do that yet.

But that said, I'll die never experiencing that before trusting anything Elon Musk is involved with.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What happens if your brain implant is like a phone, and stops getting updates after 2 or so years? That'd suck really bad.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Then I'm jailbreaking my brain implant and installing Linux on it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The bootloaders gonna be locked.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It can only stay locked for so long

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You gonna open up your brain to flash the ROM?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Probably get a unit w/o having it implanted, modify it, then get it installed unofficially. (Don't ask who or where, because that won't be shared publicly, as it will almost certainly be illegal).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Careful not to brick your brain implant.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

That's all it runs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Then it wouldn't be absolutely proprietary

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I know shocking

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He is clearly speaking in the context of a private company, such as neuralink, creating the technology. Come on dude why are you feigning ignorance here? Everyone is on the same page.