this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
466 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
2948 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If it has such a small effect, why is Apple so hell-bent on stopping it?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Because purchases not made in the App Store are purchases Apple isn't making revenue from.

Mac already can side load and Windows can side load these days as well. Hell my fucking Chromebook that is going on, 7 years old can side load Linux software and Android applications and not any single damn one of my machines have I had a security concern with an app.

Most people don't even know what side loading is. Apple was hellbent on stopping it because it stops revenue.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago

Windows can sideload? You’re making it sound like Windows has somehow allowed this lately; reality is “side loading” was just called “installing” since time immemorial.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Isn't it more about branding and control? Apple sells a package deal, an experience. Allowing a third party in could hurt their image.