Programmer Humor

19817 readers

60 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

492

GitHub Desktop or Git CLI? (programming.dev)

submitted 1 year ago by hypnotic_nerd to c/programmer_humor

159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] derpgon 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

JetBrains IDEs, I don't remember the last time I used the CLI.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you have forgotten the face of your father

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Linus Torvalds?

[–] eluvatar 3 points 1 year ago

This is the way

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I was looking for this comment. PHP storm and git are like best friends. I very very rarely need to resort to the CLI and generally that's for hard resetting after I screw something up

[–] expr -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Good luck doing anything remotely complicated/useful in git with an IDE. You get a small fraction of what git can do with a tool that allows absolutely 0 scripting and automation.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

IDE git is less powerful than CLI git. However I'm pretty confident that most people use more features of git by using a GUI.

CLI feature discoverability is pretty awful, you have to go out of your way and type git help to learn new commands.

With a GUI though, all the buttons are there, you just have to click a new button that you've been seeing for a while and the GUI will guide you how to use it.

[–] derpgon 10 points 1 year ago

It sounds like you don't speak from experience. I have all the automation I need. It supports git hooks on top of IDE-only features like code checking.

If I have to fire up my CLI for some mass history rewriting (like changing an author for every commit), or when the repo breaks - so be it. But by not using the CLI I save my fingers and sanity, because committing a bunch of files is several click away with little to no room for error.

I can rebase, patch, drop, rename, merge, revert, cherry pick, and solve conflicts with a click of a button rather than remembering all the commands and whatnot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I use the cli, but my main goal is to never have to do anything remotely complicated with git. Does it happen sometimes? Of course.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are automations. You can even add git hooks iirc. Mostly I find the lint and other code quality integrations nice to have in the IDE, since the inline results allow me to navigate directly to the code

Diffing is a lot easier too