this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1572 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
4 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Well, I’ll be damned. They finally won one it sounds like.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 90 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It was ruled previously that Apple don’t have a large enough market share

[–] [email protected] 111 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But if they force Google to open their app store, I hope that do it for fucking everyone.

At least on Google devices you still can sideload apps, and fairly easy TBH. My biggest annoyance is the "you can't buy stuff in apps without giving us a cut" which fucked up stuff like ebook apps etc

[–] [email protected] 49 points 11 months ago

Yeah, the Kindle app pretty blatantly tells you why they removed in-app purchases.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but US favour companies over people.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

That's why we are surprised. But given this went through, maybe they could go for it again who knows.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And it's two companies fighting, how far did the anti monopoly pushes against apple and google get before Epic took them up because they were a profitable venture?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but they also have more rights than the consumer, rather than the other way about lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I'm pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Which is weird because they have a larger market share than Google >.>

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They have a 99% market share on iPhone though. Google has less on Android.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Who has the other 1% on iPhone?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Jailbroken I assume

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Like this case?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Which is all the US courts would be looking at.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

They absolutely do. This case would only look at US market share, they don’t care about anywhere else. And why would they? Imagine a company with 10% US market share and 90% worldwide market share, would you expect US courts to deem that a monopoly?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

In the US, market share of Apple is between 50-60% while Android is between 40-50%, depending on the source. Worldwide is more in favour of Android, but this is a US lawsuit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"Sir, SIR, we are a nonprofit? Please leave or I will have to launch the facility into iFreespace and stay hovering a foot above ground for the rest of time as per the iNflanational iFukU-nion that is a slight inconvenience for anyone not part of the of the 23.000.001 iToUrPPs living aboard the ilolTax Inflationstate iLevitate CorpoHappytat KZ-23"