Technology

58303 readers

17 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

188

There’s a new iMessage for Android app — and it actually works (www.theverge.com)

submitted 11 months ago by AnActOfCreation to c/[email protected]

155 comments fedilink hide all child comments

• A new Android app called Beeper Mini allows users to send iMessages as blue bubbles from non-Apple devices.

• Beeper Mini bypasses traditional iMessage hacks by directly sending iMessages from Android devices.

• The app has been praised for its smooth functionality, sending messages seamlessly between Android and iPhone users.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sunbird worked - I was in the beta - but it turned out to have no encryption whatsoever. I am skeptical.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sunbird just relayed messages back and forth using a Mac mini in a warehouse. They probably had something that read the messages app on there and sent to their app on the phone through their servers, and seemingly forgot to encrypt anything during this process.

This is actually sending messages as iMessage. It’s been reverse engineered which is an incredible feat, iMessage has been out like …10+ years? And no one figured it out yet until this 16yr old rocks up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Doesn't iMessage require some sort of Apple-issued device id? A key, unique to a device, hard-coded in the SoC? (which is easy to block if over-used).

Which is why hackintoshes used to require crazy workarounds to get this working, even with Apple's own software, if I remember correctly (never tried myself, could be wrong).

How did they get around this? (did they?)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It does, the article actually mentions that. Yes, they did get around or reverse-engineer it. The article does not describe how, though I imagine it's doing the same sort of workaround that Hackintoshes have to do. Honestly, it's quite a feat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Check out my reply

I posted some links that get into the details of how the tech works

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

How did they get around this?

This blog post does a fairly good job outlining the tech

You can also take a look at the pypush proof-of-concept code that this is based on

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Thanks, the second link talks about this in the "data.plist" and Mac serial numbers section.