Asklemmy

43857 readers

1641 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Do you think AI is more likely to end Humanity or to end Capitalism? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I feel as of CEOs worried about the dangers of AI are equating the end of Capitalism with the end of the world, what are your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'm more referring to a rogue AI with AGI deciding to end capitalism to save the world and ergo itself since it could view eliminating Capitalism easier than eliminating Humanity.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Basically every other scenario is more likely than the development of AGI within the next 1000 years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Humanity will likely be over because of global warming before AGIs are a thing.