this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
788 points (96.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

19593 readers
477 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
788
Yes (programming.dev)
submitted 1 year ago by mac to c/programmer_humor
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

Just don't call it with #!/bin/sh. Because that's POSIX shell, not bash.

[–] philm 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

but effectively it's bash, I think /bin/sh is a symlink to bash on every system I know of...

Edit: I feel corrected, thanks for the information, all the systems I used, had a symlink to bash. Also it was not intended to recommend using bash functionality when having a shebang !#/bin/sh. As someone other pointed out, recommendation would be #!/usr/bin/env bash, or !#/bin/sh if you know that you're not using bash specific functionality.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Still don't do this. If you use bash specific syntax with this head, that's a bashism and causes issues with people using zsh for example. Or with Debian/*buntu, who use dash as init shell.

Just use #!/bin/bash or #!/usr/bin/env bash if you're funny.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

#!/bin/bash doesn't work on NixOS since bash is in the nix store somewhere, #!/usr/bin/env bash resolves the correct location regardless of where bash is

[–] JackbyDev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Are there any distos with /usr/bin/env in a different spot? I still believe that's the best approach for getting bash.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All posix-compliant distros need /usr/bin/env

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I do think a simple symlink is superior to a tool parsing stuff. A shame POSIX choose this approach.

Still the issue that a posix shell can be on a non-posix system and vice versa. And certificates versus used practice. Btw, isn't there only one posix certified Linux distro? Was it Suse?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Posix certification is dumb but posix compliance is nice to ensure some level of compatibility.

Symlinks would be pretty bad in the case of nixos. Wouldn't fit at all

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My own. I use arch btw

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)