this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1137 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
9 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Nuclear power is actually way cheaper.

You just need to find a geologically safe place to put it and you need to make sure everyone involved follows safety protocols to the letter. And you can't have anyone cutting corners to save money. You need to spare no expense when it comes to safety.

The only issue is that people don't stay strict with keeping everything safe sometimes. People are terrified of it because when something goes wrong, everyone can see the very gruesome results very quickly

But I don't think microsoft or any company should be making an AI at the rate they are if it's going to take as much resources as it seems.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source#Capital_costs

No, it isnt.
Safety isnt what makes nuclear expensive. You actually got rawdogged by Nuclear fanatics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn. Sucks to still see Natural Gas as the cheapest.

I think that modern nuclear designs have a place in decarbonization but I don't think it is cheaper and we have a lot of hurdles still.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Wind power at shores is generally cheapest

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wikipedia is owned by someone who's married to an intelligence agency member.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see absolutely no relevance here

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wikipedia is owned by someone who's married to an intelligence agency member.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Lemmy is owned by genocide deniers. Whats your point?

[–] UFODivebomb 4 points 1 year ago

Yea this entire clickbait can be summarized as "company looks to spend less on high capacity power"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Rare lemming reasonable take

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And you just need to find good non science fiction way to deal with nuclear waste.

And some ethical ways of aquiring uranium.

With all that calculated in, I am certain how much cheaper it is.