Games

32949 readers

1018 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

Submissions have to be related to games
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No excessive self-promotion
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

110

Starfield, is it getting review bombed? (youtu.be)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

198 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Seems kind of like the game is just suffering from reactionaries, but I definitely don't put that much stock in critic reviews these days either.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn even the outer worlds had that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I got Outer Worlds because of all the talk about it having more choice than Fallout 4 and didn't find that to be true at all. It was largely the same with nothing but Yes, No, and Not Now options.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree, every potential option for betrayal or aligning with one cause versus another in any given scenario was just as good as any other Bethesda game.

The narrative was tighter and not as open world, but I liked the art design a lot and gameplay well enough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I disagree, every potential option for betrayal or aligning with one cause versus another in any given scenario was just as good as any other Bethesda game.

That's what I was saying tho. It was only just as good as any other Bethesda game; but it was being praised for being so much better than that.