Linux

5299 readers

271 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out [email protected]

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon

anzo

dwraf_of_ignorance

The technical merits of Wayland are mostly irrelevant (utcc.utoronto.ca)

submitted 1 year ago by sizeoftheuniverse to c/linux

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] onlinepersona 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I thought this was going to be a bullshit article about "X is as good as Wayland", but the author does have a point as I haven't switched to Wayland yet for the simple fact that I've seen other users struggle with sharing their desktop. My time is not going to be spent figuring that out xdg-desktop-portal-wlr? Yeah, no. It's not worth my time.

Also, the Wayland page on the nixos wiki is woefully empty. While the nixos manual says

While X11 (see X Window System) is still the primary display technology on NixOS, Wayland support is steadily improving

programs.sway.enable = true;

This installs the sway compositor along with some essential utilities. Now you can start sway from the TTY console.

Kekw. So it'll boot into a TTY, I'll have to login and start sway? Are you nuts? Absolutely no thank you. If it's at that level, I'm not going to be the poor sod figuring out the rest and documenting it.

Once there's a new application which should absolutely be in my library and that doesn't support X, that will be the day wayland will be spun up.

[–] silt 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m not going to be the poor sod figuring out the rest and documenting it.

I've got great news for you

[–] onlinepersona 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'll be honest, if I have to open a console and go edit a few files to configure sway, I'm out. It always starts with "just edit this one file" and balloons to "yeah, if you want everything to work you'll need this over here, and that over there too, oh and I forgot to document this totally optional but mandatory thing that you'll find out about on stackoverflow". Have enough PTSD from "just make && sudo make install" to believe that things are that easy - especially if Arch mentions it.

Thanks for the link, it might come in handy someday, but Wayland is off-limits until my X11 system becomes unstable.

[–] silt 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a perfectly fair criticism as far as the average user is concerned, which is why Plasma and GNOME have both made using Wayland as simple as flipping a switch. You at least seemed to imply that you're a NixOS user, though. Does that not consist mostly of editing config files?

[–] onlinepersona 1 points 1 year ago

That is true. I have nixos and multiple debian variants running in my house. Nix has a semi-functional graphical interface for modifying that file, but I don't want to start editing my .profile in order to get sway to work. My current focus is on a different project right now (and will be for the foreseeable future). Experimenting with wayland isn't on my TODO list right now, especially with the notice in the nixos manual and wiki.

load more comments (4 replies)