this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
724 points (96.3% liked)
Programmer Humor
23600 readers
889 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Can someone explain to me how to compile a C library with "main" and a program with main? How does executing a program actually work? It has an executable flag, but what actually happens in the OS when it encounters a file with an executable file? How does it know to execute "main"? Is it possible to have a library that can be called and also executed like a program?
Anti Commercial-AI license
Way too long an answer for a lemmy post
Depends on OS. Linux will look at the first bytes of the file, either see (ASCII)
#!
(called a shebang) or ELF magic, then call the appropriate interpreter with the executable as an argument. When executing e.g. python, it's going to call/usr/bin/env
with parameterspython
and the file name because the shebang was#!/usr/bin/env python
.Compiled C programs are ELF so it will go through the ELF header, figure out which
ld.so
to use, then start that so that it will find all the libraries, resolve all dynamic symbols, then do some bookkeeping, and jump to_start
. That is, it doesn't:main
is a C thing.Absolutely.
ld.so
is an example of that.. Actually, wait, I'm not so sure any more, I'm getting things mixed up withlibdl.so
. In any caseld.so
is an executable with a file extension that makes it look like a library.EDIT: It does work. My (GNU) libc spits out version info when executed as an executable.
If you want to start looking at the innards like that I would suggest starting here: Hello world in assembly. Note the absence of a
main
function, the symbol the kernel actually invokes is_start
, the setup necessary to call a Cmain
is done bylibc.so
. Don't try to understand GNU's libc it's full of hystarical raisins I would suggest musl.How does that work? There must be something above
ld.so
, maybe the OS? Because looking at the ELF header,ld.so
is a shared library "Type: DYN (Shared object file)"The program headers don't have interpreter information either. Compare that to
ls
"Type: EXEC (Executable file)".It feels like somewhere in the flow there is the same thing that's happening in python just more hidden. Python seems to expose it because a file can be a library and an executable at the same time.
Anti Commercial-AI license
~~Your ld.so contains:~~
EDIT: ...with which I meant, modulo brainfart: My
libc.so.6
contains a proper entry address, while other libraries are pointing at0x0
and coredump when executed.libc.so
is a linker script, presumably because GNU compulsively overcomplicates everything....I guess that's enough for the kernel. It might be a linux-only thing, maybe even unintended and well linux doesn't break userspace.
Speaking of, I was playing it a bit fast and loose:
_start
is merely the default symbol name for the entry label, I'm sure nasm and/or ld have ways to set it to something different.Btw,
ld.so
is a symlink told-linux-x86-64.so.2
at least on my system. It is an statically linked executable. Theld.so
is, in simpler words, an interpreter for the ELF format and you can run it:Which seems to be contained in the only executable ~~section~~ segment of
ld.so
Edit: My understanding of this quite shallow; the above is a segment that in this case contains the entirety of the
.text
section.