Linux

7404 readers

336 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon

anzo

dwraf_of_ignorance

Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Rocky Linux Embrace RISC-V (news.itsfoss.com)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/linux

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ah, money. From another quick glance: I see.

I honestly would only shit in a Red Hat if I couldn't find a dirty portajohn so I really don't care. I do understand they are very important in Business (ha!ha!)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I do understand they are very important in Business

So is Ubuntu, which is only a side-step away from Debian. But, while I hate dpkg, at least Debian is ethically clean.

[–] LeFantome 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Not according to the Free Software Foundation.

Also, Red Hat contributes more GPL code than Debian does.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Redhat, for at least a decade, has focused on services, with which I already said I have no issue. I haven't seen or heard of anyone paying for Redhat just to get a base imagine with no support.