Linux

7347 readers

265 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon

anzo

dwraf_of_ignorance

-11

Should we use *Linux when referring to the entire system, instead of Linux? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/linux

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been thinking about the best way to refer to systems that use the Linux kernel, whilst avoiding the confusions that come with using the latter for both meanings. Since there are GNU and non-GNU (e.g, Alpine Linux) systems, I assume that *Linux would cover both. However, for users without a technical background, the asterisk means much less than it does to developers — this seems self-deprecating, considering that the point of the suggested term is to avoid confusion for NON-TECHNICAL users. Am I overthinking?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LeFantome 10 points 2 days ago

If just saying Linux confuses you, just say Linux distro and / or Linux kernel explicitly.

To me, Linux means Linux distro unless further clarification or comedy is given. If you mean the kernel, you should always say so—the Linux kernel.

Non-technical users have no idea what the kernel is and you are not going to talk to them about it. So, when you say Linux they think Linux distro. It is not confusing unless we make it that way.