this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
463 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1861 readers
254 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

christ this post is odious

I feel quite confident in stating two things. 1) you fucking suck at your job. 2) the people reliant on you for things fucking hate dealing with you.

the fact that you wrote this much florid effluent opinion, with as paltry examples as you bring to bear.... christ

just fucking learn some scripting languages, ffs

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Make a point or go away. Ad-hominem is nonsense is boring.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s only ad-hominem if they discredit your points by insulting you. If they read your points and use them to make statements about your character, that’s not ad hominem, that’s valid inference.

You probably need an example. Let’s say Alice and Beelice are having a conversation.

Alice: “I think seed oils are bad for you because RFK Jr. said so! MAGA!”

If Beelice says: “Alice, you are a real sack of potatoes, and therefore you are wrong,” that’s ad hominem.

If Beelice says: “Alice, if you’re going to parrot RFK Jr, then the worms deserve to eat the rotten flesh in your skull,” that’s plain inference.

Understand now, dear?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

how dare I use someone's own words against them!