this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
287 points (99.3% liked)

Ukraine

9875 readers
429 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

[email protected]

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I dunno chat, as a Lithuanian (as if it matters) this feels like a bit of an over reach in a war on terror in US type of way. This isn't the only law that explicitly targets Russians/Belarussians as a security threat that has been enacted.

These people are often just nationals, citizens of their country and not automatically foreign agents. If they were here doing espionage, they would report back using encrypted channels on the internet which is much cheaper than traveling back and forth. If they were smuggling tools for terrorism like bombs, it's much easier to smuggle them over the border or even obtain them locally than having the foreign agent themselves smuggle.

I can't help but view it as discriminatory in a similar way how Muslim and Arab populations were treated post-9/11, it just doesn't make much sense unless I'm missing something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Same. I’m in western europe, I have a couple friends who are Russian and oppose the invasion.

The male ones haven’t gone back to see their family because they fear conscription.

Those who can go back to see family are super cautious and scared because they don’t wanna be sent to gulag.

It’d be a shame if they got another barrier to going home they had to worry about.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Much cheaper, but not more secure.

Excluding that, if my country had started a territorial way of aggression, and I was now living in a country that's been threatened by said country in the recent past as well, I wouldn't be traveling back, let alone often.

Combined with actual continual examples of Russians not only spying but carrying out assassinations in foreign countries (like the UK) and sabotaging infrastructure almost every month, and if anything, this is pretty light retaliation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You personally wouldn't travel back and forth, but this doesn't necessarily apply to everyone - there were and still are a decent amount of Russian nationals working/living here with their families, distant or otherwise, still living back home in Russia/Belarus. No matter your nationality, you might want to go back to your home country and visit your family. What if there's an emergency/funeral you have to attend after visiting? It might not be a valid reason to go back (given how vague the articles are), and you might lose your residence because of it. It's only one example of course, but there definitely are more scenarios like this one.

Also, reading one of the news articles, counter-terrorism prevention isn't even mentioned once, and it wouldn't make sense given how I already outlined how it would be easier to get tools for terrorism locally, much safely too given how you don't have to go through security that scrutinizes you more due to war-time, not to mention it doesn't prevent terrorism from foreign agents who don't own a residence here. If anything, the article mentions how these methods are there to further sanction Russia, to show solidarity to Ukraine and "limit specific Russian/Belarusian citizen rights".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Those legit people can apply for citizenship.

This is lithuania not russia. Russia needs to make living comfortable for russians, not lithuania. Lithuanias job is to provide security for it's citizens and ensure the survival of lithuanian culture. There is citizenship for people who like that and want that, no matter what country you frequent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You need 10 years of residence before you can apply, and from what I hear from friends it's not a sure thing. So you may be stuck living as a resident for much longer than that.

Is it fair to not being able to go see your relatives for years/decade+? I'd pay that price for getting out of russia (well I already am paying it, albeit not to Lithuania) doesn't make it right tho.

But then again, as long as ru/br immigrants are still able to enter, live and obtain citizenship, can't really be mad at the baltics they're in a tough position.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Is it fair to not being able to go see your relatives for years/decade+?

The article says no more then once every three months, how is this years/decades ?

I'd be more worried about being detained on the Russian side.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Fair on both counts.

I would not risk travelling to russia as a resident of its neighbor, both because russia can send you to jail/trench, and because your residency can be easily revoked/not extended. Permanently living somewhere as a non-citizen is a vulnerable position, and getting a citizenship is often outside your control.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Its a bit rough but other than "stip zigzagging across rhe border constantly* it's not a big deal and not a real restriction. I went home like twice a year when I lived abroad.