this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
286 points (99.3% liked)

Ukraine

9875 readers
640 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

[email protected]

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

They already stripped and/or barred Russians from becoming citizens a few years back, so this kind of follows that trajectory.

The argument from Lithuania as I understand it that purging Russians reduces the 'protecting Russians abroad' narrative from Putin. Though it does mean one less place where Russians who oppose Putin can go while also displacing potentially thousands of Russians into Putin's other narrative that western/NATO powers are out to get them.

Hope this maneuver pays off, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Bravo Lithuania! The rest of the EU and ECC should do the same until Russia somehow becomes a normal country.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

This is pretty clearly a massive violation of the UN human rights convention.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

At least one member of the EU has balls.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago

As a lithuanian: woo! Yeah! That's what we're talking about, that's what it's all about! Woo! πŸ‡±πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡±πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡±πŸ‡Ή

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I dunno chat, as a Lithuanian (as if it matters) this feels like a bit of an over reach in a war on terror in US type of way. This isn't the only law that explicitly targets Russians/Belarussians as a security threat that has been enacted.

These people are often just nationals, citizens of their country and not automatically foreign agents. If they were here doing espionage, they would report back using encrypted channels on the internet which is much cheaper than traveling back and forth. If they were smuggling tools for terrorism like bombs, it's much easier to smuggle them over the border or even obtain them locally than having the foreign agent themselves smuggle.

I can't help but view it as discriminatory in a similar way how Muslim and Arab populations were treated post-9/11, it just doesn't make much sense unless I'm missing something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Same. I’m in western europe, I have a couple friends who are Russian and oppose the invasion.

The male ones haven’t gone back to see their family because they fear conscription.

Those who can go back to see family are super cautious and scared because they don’t wanna be sent to gulag.

It’d be a shame if they got another barrier to going home they had to worry about.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Much cheaper, but not more secure.

Excluding that, if my country had started a territorial way of aggression, and I was now living in a country that's been threatened by said country in the recent past as well, I wouldn't be traveling back, let alone often.

Combined with actual continual examples of Russians not only spying but carrying out assassinations in foreign countries (like the UK) and sabotaging infrastructure almost every month, and if anything, this is pretty light retaliation.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί