this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
426 points (98.9% liked)

Open Source

33944 readers
152 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thought this was interesting and worth knowing about

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] onlinepersona 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Vivaldi? The closed source browser? How do you know it shares nothing?

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because it's an independent employee owned cooperative from Norway, without any extern investors. It don't need to share data to make money. It's business model is different from sharing userdata.

PP

At Vivaldi Technologies AS (“Vivaldi AS”), protecting your privacy is a top priority. We strictly protect the security of any and all personal information you provide to us while using Vivaldi products and services. We do not share or sell information to any third party and we proactively protect all user data from disclosure, with the only exception being if requested by legitimate law agencies with a court order.

Tests (Webbkoll, Blacklight)

It is currently much more important to promote EU products to break the hegemony of the great US corporations. Vivaldi (Norway), along with Mullvad (Sweden) and Konqueror (Germany) are the only relevant browsers in the EU, after the disconinuated since some years UR Browser (France). As said, Vivaldi also include an inbuild Mail client and Feed reader, so are no need to use Thunderbird or other extern app.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I very much agree with this. Not all closed software means it's "evil". Look at obsidian for example that's closed source but ut has a widely accepted user base nonetheless. Vivaldi is a great browser choice and way within my "threat model" at least.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is the point, it's not so important that a few % of the UI source of an browser is proprietary or not, way more important for the user are the ethics and transparency of an company

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Yeah! Obviously not for everyone - but i do think people should re-consider their initial judgments. Just like I recently decided to switch to Fastmail away from Proton. I did some research around Fastmail, and to me, their missions and values won me over. For example, they help develop open standards such as jmap over imap. They own all of their own hardware - and encrypt all data at rest. Might not suit everyone, but defo suits me well and it's been a very nice experience so far.