this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
662 points (97.7% liked)

Not The Onion

13784 readers
1479 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Why are you wrapping random words with quotation marks? It reads like it's being spoken aloud by Dr. Evil. Anyway, gonna go with the wording of the law itself over a wiki article about it:

18 U.S. Code § 331 - Mutilation, diminution, and falsification of coins

This one's specific to coins. Anecdotally I was always told they were legal because pennies are explicitly an exception to that law. So, it's either that or it's in j-walking territory where it may be illegal, but no one gives a shit enough to enforce it.

...also coins aren't really relevant here anyway - the conversation is about defacing paper bills if they decide to soil them with Trump's traitorous image.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

the conversation is about defacing paper bills if they decide to soil them with Trump’s traitorous image.

Which is not at all illegal by any standard you've provided yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Except by the wording of the specific law in question. o_O

I'm not seeing the disconnect here. Nor the need for the disconnect in the first place: the first post I made here was to encourage people to deface prints of Trump. If you disagree that there's a legal barrier to doing so, then cool - all the more reason to deface our traitor in chief.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Are you intending to render the bill unfit to be reissued?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

YES. My suggestion was to mark Trump as the Nazi he is - currency with Nazi iconography on it is not fit to be reissued. It's a petty protest, but the point is to make the proposed new bills inconvenient and convey a clear message until they're inevitably pulled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

That's not not how that works..., 🙄