Programming Languages

1230 readers

14 users here now

Hello!

This is the current Lemmy equivalent of https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammingLanguages/.

The content and rules are the same here as they are over there. Taken directly from the /r/ProgrammingLanguages overview:

This community is dedicated to the theory, design and implementation of programming languages.

Be nice to each other. Flame wars and rants are not welcomed. Please also put some effort into your post.

This isn't the right place to ask questions such as "What language should I use for X", "what language should I learn", and "what's your favorite language". Such questions should be posted in /c/learn_programming or /c/programming.

This is the right place for posts like the following:

"Check out this new language I've been working on!"
"Here's a blog post on how I implemented static type checking into this compiler"
"I want to write a compiler, where do I start?"
"How does the Java compiler work? How does it handle forward declarations/imports/targeting multiple platforms/?"
"How should I test my compiler? How are other compilers and interpreters like gcc, Java, and python tested?"
"What are the pros/cons of ?"
"Compare and contrast vs. "
"Confused about the semantics of this language"
"Proceedings from PLDI / OOPSLA / ICFP / "

See /r/ProgrammingLanguages for specific examples

Related online communities

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

armchair_progamer

The Vine Programming Language (vine.dev)

submitted 16 hours ago by armchair_progamer to c/programming_languages

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The interesting part starts at https://vine.dev/docs/features/inverse

Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43144040

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

This language reminded me the duality framework developed by Zena Ariola and Paul Dowen (there probably are other people working on it) based on classical logic.

This is not surprising, as vine claimed to be based on interaction net, a model of classical linear logic. However there are several questions that I hope to get some answers:

Based on my extremely limited understanding, Ariola and Dowen's framework seems to admit a evaluation order for the continuation (a expression with "expectation") for each evaluation of values, like call-by-covalue, call-by-coneed. I was wondering what is the evaluation order of the continuation here.
How does the linear aspect of the interaction net comes into the picture? Is there linear types?