this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
806 points (97.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

6924 readers
2249 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I understand language changes over time but sometimes it's stupider than others

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

From your biased, subjective point of view that has nothing to do with the objective facts of language, maybe.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Objectively, any words with more than two vocals in succession is dumb and only meant for cheating at Scrabble, objectively

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

verbing a word that isn't commonly verbed? that's the main thing i love in the English langauge, the flexibility to fuck around with it and still be understood by others without having to explain what you're doing

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Now you're Englishing proper m8.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

Literally didn't understand it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Using the suffix -er for a two syllable word isn't any correcter than verbing a noun and would probably make quite a few English teachers red in the face.

Both have a linguistic use; the verb "vaguing" is a shortened form of the cumbersome "vague-posting", while "stupider" is a more emphatic and/of colloquial form of "more stupid". Neither can be replaced by their more formal form without changing the meaning of the sentence slightly.

Objectively they are very similar linguistic quirks, the only reason you'd use one but dislike the other is familiarity. Why dismiss it out of hand when you can excitedly marvel at a novel way people can remotely transfer thoughts?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i mean, you understood the meaning of the sentence, right? so the person managed to get their point accross, and saved on length by using that form - that's actually quite linguistically clever!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I got an idea that the person was venting/ranting but couldn't understand the specifics of the term "vauguing". There's so many mistakes in their response that I just assumed it was a typo.

Looks likes it's a word that been around since the 1600s but is pretty much never used anymore.

https://www.oed.com/dictionary/vaguing_adj?tl=true&tab=factsheet

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I could only guess the meaning. Disagree all around