this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
360 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

61850 readers
2884 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/54702508

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Decades ago....

"Why do I need electricity? I have candles. Lights seem excessive."

Yes, but once most people have electricity, new products will be designed to take advantage of it. Now you can have a washing machine, for example.

Broadband is the same. Once most of your population has high bandwidth, we can start to design things that will use it. Right now we're still designing for DSL speeds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

That's entirely speculative. There are diminishing returns. Unless you're going to host your own YouTube, the use case for 50Gbps connections to the home is quite small. 4K video streaming at Ultra HD Blu-ray bitrates doesn't even come close to saturating 1Gbps, and all streaming services compress 4K video significantly more than what Ultra HD Blu-ray offers. The server side is the limit, not home connections.

Now, if you want to talk about self-hosting stuff and returning the Internet to a more peer-to-peer architecture, then you need IPv6. Having any kind of NAT in the way is not going to work. Connection speed still isn't that important.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

there could be some new thing that no one has not even bothered to think about because of the limitations. Imagine streaming back when downloading few kilobytes for an hours was considered reasonable, people would have laughed at the very thought of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

We're not using the bandwidth we have. Many US cities have service with 1Gbps download speed available. I have it for my own reasons. Servers are the bottleneck; they rarely even reach half that speed.

If we're not using 1Gbps, why should we believe something would pop up if we had 50Gbps?

Now, direct addressing where everyone can be a server and bandwidth utilization is spread more towards the edges of the network? Then you have something that could saturate 1Gbps. But you can't do that on IPv4.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Unless you're going to host your own YouTube....

This is exactly what peer tube is struggling with. This bandwidth would solve the video federation problem.

See, you get it!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Except we need IPv6 before that's at all viable.

We are not even filling out the bandwidth of pipes we have to the home right now. "If you build it, they will come" does not apply when there's already something there that isn't being fully utilized.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Oh, maybe. I'm not familiar with bandwidth utilization in China.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How exactly does NAT prevent that? On good hardware it adds insignificant latency.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It has nothing to do with latency, and everything to do with not being able to directly address things behind NAT.

Edit: and please, nobody argue that NAT increases security. That dumbass argument should have died the moment it was first uttered.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yes but have you considered China bad?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

China morally bankrupt and developing at a staggering pace which has somewhat stymied as their scoffing at regulations in favor of backroom dealings is kneecapping themselves.

So if you zoom in close enough, like looking at this amazingly fast reported internet speed and only at this speed, China "good."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Notice how many extra hoops you jumped through to get here

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

To arrive at "China Good," yes you do need to jump through many hoops. Glad we're on the same page, even if you started out strangely.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao the irony

You have serious ego issues that you will need self reflection to fix.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Feel free to elaborate. I have no idea what you're talking about other than it seems like tankie screeching to me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And then he blocked me XD

All these egotistical children with nothing to be proud of

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Who blocked you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So I'm just going to be a completely different person once I have access to these speeds or you are suggesting new tech that will be made available to consumers?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

The second one.

Think back to when you were on dial-up. The concept of a streaming movie service would have been a fantasyland. No one was creating one. The infrastructure wasn't there. It was impossible.

As soon as people started getting broadband, and enough people got it, streaming services could exist.

Are you different? No, you just want to watch a movie. But now you don't have to go to Blockbuster.