this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
309 points (97.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

20265 readers
1788 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Have to add that we work exclusively in strongly-typed languages. Kinda want to see how it plays out, but I can't help but argue with him, so I think I'll just go.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

... and yet... it lacks clear and enforced type restrictions which help with clear code contracts. It's certainly better than Javascript but the lack of runtime enforced type checking can force defensive programming in an unnecessary manner.

Your statement isn't strict type checking. It's a restricted form of type coercion. Given how common this feature is in other languages it's weird that pythonistas feel so defensive when discussing the feature. I enjoy strict type checking, but that's my opinion - it makes it a poor choice for the sorts of projects I work on but if it's good for you then enjoy!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

it lacks clear and enforced type restrictions which help with clear code contracts

Not anymore! Gradual typing is supported by the core language and pyright is a fantastic incremental type checker that you can use both in your editor and in CI.

[–] wraithcoop 3 points 2 days ago

You said it's not runtime type checking but then switched to "strict type checking" - those aren't the same. Other person has it right, it has runtime type checking. The type checking happens when running your code. I don't think that's particularly useful, it's pretty much sugar on top of what would throw an error anyway.