this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
416 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59993 readers
2054 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dragonlobster 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

These things are unreliable, I had 3 seagate HDDs in a row fail on me. Never had an issue with SSDs and never looked back.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seagate in general are unreliable in my own anecdotal experience. Every Seagate I've owned has died in less than five years. I couldn't give you an estimate on the average failure age of my WD drives because it never happened before they were retired due to obsolescence. It was over a decade regularly though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

HDD is unreliable with all those moving parts and arms and cilinders.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

well until you need capacity why not use an SSD. It's basically mandatory for the operating system drive too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Capacity for what?. There are 4tb SSD m.2 costing $200 bucks cmon...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I would rather not buy so large SSDs. for most stuff the performance advantage is useless while the price is much larger, and my impression is still that such large SSDs have a shorter lifespan (regarding how many writes will it take to break down). recovering data fron a failing HDD is also easier: SSDs just turn read-only or completely fail at one point, in the latter case often even data recovery companies being unable to recover anything, while HDDs will often give signs that a good monitoring software can detect weeks or months before, so that you know to be more cautious with it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

How is it easier? Do you open your HDDs and take info from there? Do you have specialized equipment and knowledge? Second, if you detect on smart that you are closer to TBW, change the SSD duh... Smart is a lot more effective on SSDs depending the model it even gives you time to live...