this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
727 points (96.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6788 readers
874 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think if you're assassinating a public figure you're a little past caring about what's "allowed"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'll pitch in bail money either way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Me too, just tell me where to send the Doge

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I was taking about like, it's considered a war crime? Skipping the soldiers dying and straight up killing the dude.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well once the nuke is dropped, anything related to Geneva Conventions or any other Conventions go out the window.

[–] foenkyfjutschah 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

sure, a stand-of between Biden and Putin would have been best right at the beginning.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why Biden? He's not in this war except as a multi service shop. It would have been Zelinsky/Putin.

[–] foenkyfjutschah 1 points 1 month ago

please take a closer look at the posted graphics!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The conflict is between Russia and Ukraine, so it would be Zelenisky vs Putin

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Any major power could easily assasinate the leadership of any other major power, but doing so is taboo for obvious reasons.The nuclear taboo is higher on the list of "things that are not done."

Opening the door to actually using nuclear weapons represents a threat to everyone -- including the rich and powerful. Whoever is dumb enough to use even a tactical nuke is going to not only find themselves a pariah, they're going to face coordinated efforts to eliminate the threat they represent by everyone.

Imagine being in his inner circle: you'd be getting credible offers of "whatever you need and want" to remove Putin from power from every major power on the planet.