Not The Onion

12129 readers

1434 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Lily Allen Makes More Money from OnlyFans Than Spotify (consequence.net)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

136 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It is my first belief that, given a proper pitch, ANYTHING can be sold at a profit.

Also, there's rule 34: If a thing exists, it's someones fetish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If it exists there is porn of it... Not sure where you got that other version from

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You can probably extrapolate from "if it exists, there is porn of it (no exceptions)".

If there is porn of something, the most likely reason is that someone has a fetish for it.

If the person making the porn doesn't have a fetish for said thing, then they're making it for an existing market of people.

QED, you can say "if it exists, someone has a fetish for it"

P.S: What if there isn't porn of something? Rule 35 states that if it doesn't exist, it will be made.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You have fundamentally misunderstood millennial meme culture ca. 2006 (roughly when the rules were made).

No one having a fetish for it would be extremely motivating to create such porn. People realized after it was made that they had a fetish for it. See: Shrek.

So technically you can still say "if it exists, someone has a fetish for it" but you've relied on correlation to determine causation and gotten it backwards. This is a great example of why we don't do that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

Just because you can extrapolate something from it, doesn't mean you can change the words in the rule. They got the rule wrong, simple as that.