Asklemmy

44148 readers

1408 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

If there were only three laws, which should they be? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ICastFist 41 points 2 months ago (2 children)

            
              Any law, except this one, may be subdivided into smaller sections;
No law may alter the first law or this law;
Now, let's get to business: ...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Stage is set

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That, or just creating a new category of "total rules" that aren't technically laws, but behave the same way.

Not enough laws (or alternatively autocrats) is a power vacuum, and those never last, so this is a bit like asking "what if squares only had three corners".