this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
48 points (84.3% liked)

Programming

17493 readers
52 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Of course. You can host Wordpress just about anywhere that offers a recent enough version of php and access to a database

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then why does WP engine need access to this specific database?

[–] RonSijm 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because Wordpress is also hosting 1000s of plugins that WP engine users can install.

I'm not sure what the license regarding those things is, WP engine could probably just mirror it -

But they basically got locked out of the default ecosystem infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like mirroring the plugins would resolve this issue, since the argument seems to be centered on server costs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The argument centering on server costs would be logical, but the actual legal battle going on, and Mullenweg's stated justification behind asking for 8% of WPEngine profit, is claims of misuse of copyrighted names.

Meanwhile the WordPress license explicitly cedes copyright over the name WordPress and the initialism WP.