Programming

17480 readers

259 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe

Ategon

[email protected]

197

Git grumpy: Torvalds complains of passive voice in merge commit messages (www.neowin.net)

submitted 1 month ago by AnActOfCreation to c/programming

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Linus Torvalds expressed frustration over the use of passive voice in merge commit messages, preferring active and imperative language instead.

He provided an example of how commit messages should be rewritten for clarity and consistency across the project.

Torvalds noted that while it's not a major issue, it does add extra work when he has to rewrite messages to match his preference.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, uh, I have a colleague who studied linguistics, and when I explained to her that we write commit messages like that, her reaction was basically: What the fuck, why?

My explanation wasn't as sharp, as I didn't call it "imperative" but rather just "infinitive", which got me the immediate backlash that it's not a sentence then, so why do you put a dot behind it?

She did accept my ~~descriptivist excuses~~ explanation that we write it that way, because it's terser, but I know it didn't sit well with her.
Will need to see what her reaction is to commanding the repo. 😅

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you put a dot after commit msg?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yup. Commit messages are often shown in truncated form, which is when the dot helps to know whether you're seeing the whole message or not.

Well, and every so often, I'll use the commit message to document why a change was made, which requires multiple sentences. Then the dot just serves its usual purpose of separating sentences.