this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
161 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1489 readers
96 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 98 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Right, so the plan is to spend 20 years and 40 petawatt hours building a machine to answer the Great ℚuestion of what we should do about climate change. If it works, the answer will be "you should've stopped burning fossil fuels twenty years ago."

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Oh no what do about all this waste heat?"

"Generate more waste heat"

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Repeat until a machine that can create God is built. Then it's God's problem.

But it must be a US God, otherwise China wins.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The US god will team up with the Chinese god and the Russian god to beat the crap out of us.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then the middle eastern god will blow up the indian utopia because he is bored and the british fungus space god will rule over the remains.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This was exactly what I had in mind but for the life of me I can't remember the title.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Supergods by warren ellis i think.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Surprisingly close to the plot of Illuminatus!, isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I was thinking "I have no mouth and I must scream"

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The model will just go "42" on and on and it'll be the first decent joke a neural network produces. It'll be worth it in a way.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I could absolutely see an LLM telling us that 6 times 9 is 42 unless there's special tinkering to prevent it.

[–] JackbyDev 1 points 2 months ago

In the style of Douglas Adams too.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

"The answer is 34. Now here's the schematics to build an even better computer to ask the right question."