this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
806 points (98.0% liked)

People Twitter

5445 readers
1979 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackbyDev -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'm confused how three 10s gives 100. Did she mean 1000?

Edit: In case it's somehow not clear, I'm fully aware I am willfully overanalyzing the ramblings of the deranged.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

She just repeated herself. 10 fake names at 10 places is 100.

[–] JackbyDev 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why mention 10 polling booths then lmao

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's the 10 fake names and vote 10 times that's the repetition.

[–] JackbyDev -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but each name can only vote once yet she says it's 100 votes. I don't think it's a fair assumption that she meant to use one booth at each location.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

10 fake names/votes at 10 different polling places equals 100 votes. That's what she's saying. I don't see what you're not getting.

[–] JackbyDev -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It was stupid of her to say the number 10 three times and end up with 100. 10×10×10 is 1000. One of them is redundant. Logically it should be 10 votes or 1000 votes or it's redundant confusing information.