this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

130 readers
7 users here now

A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The PM9E1 is rated for 2,400 TBW (Terabytes written) in its lifespan, which is twice the 1,200 TBW of its predecessor, the PM9A1

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tatterdemalion 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those specs are crazy. Probably going to cost a fortune.

[–] Mihies 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those are sequential speeds. To me random r/w speeds are much more important, sadly these are not mentioned.