this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
368 points (92.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43986 readers
784 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You then don't see the irony in telling the LGBT "we stand with you" and then going to homophobic nations and homophobic sects and saying the same thing (because they promise help with a certain advancement in awareness)?

That goes along with what I was talking about, about people making deals with the devil (a figure of speech by the way). I'm pretty sure this phenomenon does not need any help from class phenomenon, positive or negative, in order to exist.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The irony of who telling which LGBT people and subsequently going to “homophobic” states and saying the same thing to whom?

If someone understands what you’re trying to say, perhaps they can translate for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is no "which" or "whom". That's implied in the main inquiry. Unless you just wanted to talk about class to someone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There is no “which” or “whom”.

So there is a disembodied conversation going on between two non-entities, or groups of non-entities?

That’s implied in the main inquiry.

What is implied in what inquiry?

I’ve actually run into you before, in another post, and you didn’t make sense that time, either.