this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
93 points (96.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43946 readers
551 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I generally try to stay informed on current events. With the exception of what gets posted here, I normally get my news from CNN. I tend to lean left politically, but not always.

The problem I always run into is that every news site I read, regardless of where they stand on the political spectrum, is always filled with pointless bullshit. Specifically, sports, celebrity news, and product placement. "Some shitty pop singer is dating some shitty actor" or "These are our recommendations for the best mass-produced garbage-quality fast fashion from Temu" or "Some overpaid dickhead threw a ball faster than some other overpaid dickhead."

What I'd love to find is a news source that's just news that matters. No celebrity gossip, sports, opinion pieces, etc. Just real events that have an impact on some part of the world. Legislation, natural events, economic changes, wars, political changes, that kind of thing.

Does this exist, or is all journalism just entertainment?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I can recommend Reuters, given it still has a little bit of sports and opinion, but I find it's good at providing neutral facts and sources it's knowledge from appropriate experts for its opinion pieces.

It only lacks in providing local level news, where I turn to my country's national broadcaster.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Seconding Reuters. Their primary customers are other news agencies, so Reuters generally don't add spin to a news article.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

IIRC those are like the big two in reselling stories.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Thank you!

Apparently "Agence France-Presse" or AFP is the third one, at least if you speak French.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

providing neutral facts and sources it’s knowledge from appropriate experts for its opinion pieces.

Such as Adrian Zenz. A guy who was paid by the BBC to make up absurd stories about China and who thinks god sent him on a mission to rid the world of gays and communists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No idea about this dude, but literally in the article you link, they reference Zenz as an independent researcher who says:

"Although it is speculative..."

Before providing his estimate and also provides other details which appear to support the story, but the article does not present as clear, hard "facts". Also, the title isn't some clickbait trash, and even directly says "could".