this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
94 points (79.0% liked)

Programming

17669 readers
165 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not my blog, but the author's experience reminded me of my own frustrations with Microsoft GitHub.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The meaning of words often varies with context.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Techical terms with specific meanings don't vary significantly based on context, because consistency is important in technical usage.

The author is complaining about how guthub is being poorly modernized, which is the opposite of legacy software. If she means 'something we choose use out of tradition' that isn't what legacy software means.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Techical terms with specific meanings don’t vary significantly based on context

Every lexicographer I know would challenge that notion. (And I've had more than a few experiences in technical fields that challenge it as well.)

People sometimes express themselves using words that might not fit the discussed situation directly (at least not in the typical way), but do fit closely-associated experiences they've had. They use them because those are the words that come to mind at the time.

We could pedantically gatekeep their use of language and insist that their views/experiences are invalid because we don't like their choice of words...

...or we could try to understand them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What a great point to make about language in situations that are not technical! Like how theory is used differently outside of scientific contexts, which is language naturally evolving.

But this is like someone trying to use the lay definition of theory, which is the equivalent of a hypothesis in acience, in a scientific context. A scientist saying "that is just a theory" to dismiss the theory of relativity in a scientific context would be rightfully corrected by their peers.

Using legacy software wrong is like using API to describe something other than an API.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

You've made your opinion clear; restating it and slinging downvotes doesn't help anyone. Good day.