Opensource

1406 readers

6 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

Credits

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

pylapp

Drew DeVault on the biggest threats for FOSS, and proposed solutions (fosstodon.org)

submitted 4 months ago by mke to c/opensource

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mke 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you're willing, I'd appreciate more information on this claim:

Don’t waste your time with Zulip, it is just another corporate messenger.

I tried looking it up myself, but I didn't see anything that bad. Open source, self-hostable, Apache 2 licensed, didn't see any CLA. About the Element thing, that sounds a bit far-fetched, but I'll refrain from saying anything else since I haven't had time to look into it. The Freenode story sounds interesting though, I'll try looking it up later.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The issue is the intended use case and not specific licensing and so on. Zulip targets internal chat in a corporate environment, like MS Teams and the like, which makes it ill suited as a Discord replacement.

[–] mke 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Fair point, thanks for sharing. Does that mean you consider fine the use of Zulip by open source development teams? Seeing as their main objective is providing organized chat between core contributors (with some level of outsider participation), that is, generally focused on facilitating the work of the project instead of building a community.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

If that team currently has a strong email culture, yes. Zulip is basically a "what if chat was more like threaded email" UI experiment.

Teams that are more used to Slack or Discord will probably hate it though.