this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
48 points (62.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43986 readers
748 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes, why?
pet theory: porn is for people who can't fantasise
I disagree, I can fantasize, but sometimes I'm too lazy
One thing I'm learning from this thread is maybe some people can visualise but it takes them effort?
Strange to imagine minds that are not one's own.
I mean for me it's like a checklist. But it goes by fast. Like I'll list the characteristics and then apply them to a kind of "3D model" in my head.
Or I'll just use past objects from my memory. I've seen lots of apples in my life, lol.
This sounds familiar.
Imo its just a different thing.
Like, 1 or 2 here with sort of moving images like memories, sounds, conversations.
I still listen to interviews despite being able to make up convos in my head. I watch comedy despite being able to make up jokes and funny stories.
I watch movies despite being able to visualise whatever i want.
I mean, one thing is to imagine an apple, imagining moving people is on a while another level.