SneerClub

989 readers

5 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

That tracing woodgrains peice on David Gerard is out (www.tracingwoodgrains.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

246 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

a brave editor spreads the truth

uh, or not

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I have never edited the LessWrong article, not sure what you're talking about.

receipts posted

I meant I have never disruptively edited the article. (...) I'm not a power user of Wikipedia and don't understand all your specialist terminology

Dude physically unable to take an L.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"Specialist terminology" like... the word edit?

Not sure writing an encyclopedia is a good hobby for you, bro.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

OK, I just spent 10 minutes of my life that I'll never get back clicking around Wikipedia edit histories, and it seems that LessWrongers are really unhappy about the LessWrong article saying anything about neoreactionaries. And they're willing to say why at typical length.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

aww, poor babies. if only they didn't literally have the leading nrx thinkers as figures of note in their own community makeup! alas, difficulty: impossible

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I think that might have been bad faith, but im not sure.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

christ that second reply is some pure-grade uwu smolbean pretension bullshit

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Apologies, I meant I have never disruptively edited the article

"what do you mean keep the music down? it's not that loud"

I was simply trying to improve its quality

"I merely wish you to be on my level? what's that, what level is it? it's mine of course, what a ridiculous question"

I'm not a power user of Wikipedia and don't understand all your specialist terminology so forgive me if I make the odd mistake or faux pas

don't even have a sneer for this. this "oh, oops, totes didn't mean to offend!" shit that these fuckers pull when they get caught out is so goddamn tired. facepunch material.

(it's not even particularly "good" darvo)

Please don't doxx me.

"goooootta make the other people responsible for my own actions! that's the ticket!"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Lol how has that user not been banned yet. Clearly somebody with a very specific axe to grind.

And of course the Rationalists start to the things they accuse others of doing. How quickly the pretense of civility disappears.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

I love the "uh, you know we can see what you've done" reply.