this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
76 points (94.2% liked)

Linux

5279 readers
638 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out [email protected]

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I suspect this is comparing against default Wine without fsync or esync (which are included with Proton and some wine builds) but from memory, ntsync has better compatibility and some performance gains over fsync (the next fastest alternative). But don't expect 50% performance gains compared to fsync in most workloads.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Any bit of improvement is good in my book, though I agree that the title is a bit misleading.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Its indeed on average 50%.. in some games.. Sometimes only 5% while in other cases even 150%.

[–] refalo 2 points 4 months ago

Yep, and most people are already using fsync anyways via proton/lutris/etc. so the gain is a bit misleading.