Ask Lemmy

26890 readers

1796 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

267

Should half naked pictures of anime characters be marked NSFW on Lemmy? (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

274 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I’m talking about this sort of thing. Like clearly I wouldn’t want someone to see that on my phone in the office or when I’m sat on a bus.

However there seems be a lot of these that aren’t filtered out by nsfw settings, when a similar picture of a woman would be, so it seems this is a deliberate feature I might not be understanding.

Discuss.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There is no need for any "green light", if there was a problem with the rfc we would have said so from the beginning. From what I can tell the rfc is not completed yet, and when it's completed someone still needs to step up to implement it. Even my own rfc which was finished months ago is still not merged and not implemented.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What would need to be done to complete it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well someone has to write the code.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I know someone that is willing to implement this feature, but they are waiting for merge of rfc to open a Pull Request with initial implementation.

As I understand the RFCs are for defining scope and design requirements for specific feature. And when the design is finalised RFC is merged. Then someone opens a PR to implement it.

If you were imagining some other process it would be beneficial to acknowledge change of development phase from designing to implementing.

P.S. The readme in the repo is supporting my view.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The RFC is merged now!

https://github.com/LemmyNet/rfcs/blob/main/0004-post-tags.md

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. We are currently making some last improvements to the RFC, and it should get merged within the next days.