this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
1036 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

60044 readers
2658 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was looking for a new USB-c hub and came across this article. It's an interesting write-up of what is on the inside of some popular options

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The problem is that almost all electronics available online (not just on Amazon) are rebranded Chinese bargain bin garbage marked up by 10x and people think "it must be good because it's expensive".

Really your only option is to either accept that everything is disposable and will need to be replaced frequently, or to find the "good" brands and stick to them.

That last part is by design... it's why a lot of this shit is perpetuated by the same parent company under a different name, to create a "hostile environment" to make it so you can't shop around for cheaper prices.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

All valid reasons, but the underlying of it all is that the USB consortium that comes up with these standards and fucked up the usb-c standard leaving us with this quagmire of cables and dangles. Remember the first USB-C cables? The ones that caught on fire? Or where USB 2.0 with USB-C connectors? Pepperidge Farm remembers

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This comment is basically just a tl;dr of the OP

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TL;DRs are valuable contributions!

Also, his last point is synthesizing a new argument that the situation is a deliberate confusopoly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That’s fair. I’d call the last point new commentary more than an argument since he didn’t really provide any evidence that it’s true. /pedantic